.. include:: /Includes.rst.txt
.. _migrations-mask:
====
Mask
====
The popular Mask extension is one of the most used extensions in TER. With over
one million downloads on packagist it served their users well. Content Blocks
is heavily inspired by Mask's architecture. In fact, it could be called the
successor of Mask. The combination of Mask and the concept of a Content Block
is the result of this extension. Due to this, the migration is quite simple and
doesn't even require database migrations.
.. note::
This guide assumes you are on the latest Mask version.
Automatic migration
===================
* https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/mask_to_content_blocks
* https://github.com/nhovratov/mask-to-content-blocks
The migration creates an exact equivalent of your Mask Elements as Content
Blocks. As already mentioned, no database migrations are necessary. The elements
will be re-defined in place. The command gathers all assets like icons and
templates and puts them into the appropriate folders. The config.yaml file is
built based on the mask.json file(s). Templates are simply copied, so they
potentially need manual migration.
Install the extension via composer. If you are on classic mode, do the
equivalent in the extension manager.
.. code:: shell
composer req nhovratov/mask-to-content-blocks
If you haven't yet installed Content Blocks itself, install it as well:
.. code-block:: shell
composer req friendsoftypo3/content-blocks
Then run the migration command. This migration will create the Content Blocks
into the same extension, where your Mask elements are currently loaded.
.. code-block:: shell
vendor/bin/typo3 mask-to-content-blocks:migrate
Next, remove Mask and this extension:
.. code-block:: shell
composer remove mask/mask nhovratov/mask-to-content-blocks
.. note::
Removing Mask is necessary, or else the Content Elements are defined twice:
by Mask and by Content Blocks. The Mask definition will "win".
It is still recommended you read the manual migration guide to understand, what
the automatic command is doing and what manual steps you have to do afterwards.
Manual migration
================
Install Content Blocks in parallel to Mask and follow the steps below.
Recreation of a Mask Element
----------------------------
.. figure:: ./MaskExample.png
:class: with-shadow
:alt: Example Mask slider element
Example Mask slider element
First, let's create a new Content Block for the Mask Element you want to
migrate. For this, run the command :bash:`make:content-block` and create a
Content Element with a vendor and name of your choice. The name can be the same
as the Mask name, but doesn't have to.
Next, you need to override the :yaml:`typeName` and disable prefixing. In this
example our Mask element has the name `slider`, so :yaml:`typeName` must be set
to `mask_slider`. This is the CType, which Mask generates in the background. If
you don't set this option, Content Blocks would create a unique identifier from
vendor and name, which you don't want in this case. We disable prefixing, so we
can adopt the existing Mask fields.
.. code-block:: yaml
:caption: EXT:site_package/ContentBlocks/ContentElements/slider/config.yaml
name: tx-mask/slider
typeName: mask_slider
prefixFields: false
Our Mask element has a repeating slides field. This is a Collection in terms of
Content Blocks. To adopt this field, we have to set the identifier prefixed with
`tx_mask`. Also, :yaml:`foreign_field` has to be set explicitly to
:yaml:`parentid`, as this is the column name, which Mask uses for its parent
reference field.
All other fields can be re-defined in Content Blocks as usual. Don't forget
to prefix **all** fields with `tx_mask`, even inside Collections.
.. code-block:: yaml
:caption: EXT:site_package/ContentBlocks/ContentElements/slider/config.yaml
name: tx-mask/slider
typeName: mask_slider
prefixFields: false
fields:
- identifier: tx_mask_slides
type: Collection
foreign_field: parentid
fields:
- identifier: tx_mask_header
type: Textarea
- identifier: tx_mask_text
type: Textarea
enableRichtext: true
- identifier: tx_mask_image
type: File
Templates
---------
This is the easy part. Simply copy the Mask template into **templates/frontend.html** and
you are done `*`. That said, if you didn't use any partials or layouts. If so, move
these to the according **templates/partials** and **templates/layouts** folder in your
Content Block.
.. note::
`*` This is not the whole truth. In some rare cases you need to adapt the
template when migrating to Content Blocks >= 1.0. Most probably usages of
the type `Link` field need adaptions:
.. code-block:: html
Icon
----
In case you've used a custom SVG icon for the Mask Element, you can rename it
to **icon.svg** and move it to the **assets** folder. For FontAwesome icons you
can download the SVG version from the official website.
Labels
------
Mask doesn't have a translation feature. Labels can be copied from the backend
module view, and pasted directly into the **labels.xlf** file.
.. tip::
Use the :ref:`command `
:bash:`content-blocks:language:generate vendor/name` to automatically
generate the **labels.xlf** file with automatic keys prefilled.
Finish
------
That's mostly it. Now you can purge your Mask element in the backend module view
and everything should work as before. Repeat the migration for every Mask
Element and you can uninstall the Mask extension in the end and say farewell.
.. note::
In the backend preview of your element you will see
`Element "xxx" is missing in Mask definition.`. This message will vanish as
soon as you uninstall the Mask extension.
Limitations
===========
There are some very special Mask features, which didn't make the cut to Content
Blocks (for good reason).
Page templates fields
---------------------
Mask has this quirky feature of assigning additional page fields based on TYPO3
backend layouts. There is no such feature in Content Blocks. Use custom page
types instead and migrate pages with special backend layouts to the new doktype.
Nested Content
--------------
Technically, nested content means the table tt_content has a relation to itself.
This can be achieved with Content Blocks as well with the
:ref:`help of Collections `. However, the approach is
slightly different. Mask sets the fixed value **999** for the **colPos** field
of child elements. All elements with this colPos value are simply hidden from
the backend with a hook. Naturally, they won't appear in the frontend, as this
colPos is usually not rendered. In contrast, Content Blocks uses the existing
parent reference field to systematically determine the status of a child field.
This method is far more superior as it doesn't force a random colPos value.
You do the migration as described with Collections above. In addition, you have
to add some more config.
.. code-block:: yaml
:caption: EXT:site_package/ContentBlocks/ContentElements/nested-content/config.yaml
name: tx-mask/nested-content
typeName: mask_nested_content
prefixFields: false
fields:
- identifier: tx_mask_content
type: Collection
foreign_table: tt_content
foreign_field: tx_mask_content_parent_uid
foreign_table_field: tx_mask_content_tablenames
foreign_match_fields:
tx_mask_content_role: tx_mask_content
allowedRecordTypes:
- text
- images
The allowed CTypes should be added in :yaml:`allowedRecordTypes`.
Disable Content Elements
------------------------
With Mask, you could disable certain Mask Elements so they won't appear in the
Content Element Wizard. This is not possible with Content Blocks. All defined
Content Blocks are always available. The migration is to delete those unused
elements, or restrict the usage through backend user permissions.