Unit testing with the TYPO3 testing framework¶

Unit test conventions¶

TYPO3 unit testing means using the phpunit testing framework. The TYPO3 testing framework comes with a basic UnitTests.xml file that can be used by Core and extensions. This references a phpunit bootstrap file so phpunit does find our main classes. Apart from that, there are little conventions: Tests for some "system under test" class in the Classes/ folder should be located at the same position within the Test/Unit folder having the additional suffix Test.php to the system under test file name. The class of the test file should extend the basic unit test abstract TYPO3\TestingFramework\Core\Unit\UnitTestCase. Single tests should be named starting with the method that is tested plus some explaining suffix and should be annotated with @test.

Example for a system under test located at typo3/sysext/core/Utility/ArrayUtility.php (stripped):

<?php

namespace TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility;

class ArrayUtility
{
    public static function filterByValueRecursive(
        mixed $needle = '',
        array $haystack = [],
    ): array {
        $resultArray = [];
        // System under test code
        return $resultArray;
    }
}

The test file is located at typo3/sysext/core/Tests/Unit/Utility/ArrayUtilityTest.php (stripped):

<?php

namespace TYPO3\CMS\Core\Tests\Unit\Utility;

use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\DataProvider;
use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\Test;
use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\ArrayUtility;
use TYPO3\TestingFramework\Core\Unit\UnitTestCase;

final class ArrayUtilityTest extends UnitTestCase
{
    #[DataProvider('filterByValueRecursive')]
    #[Test]
    public function filterByValueRecursiveCorrectlyFiltersArray(
        $needle,
        $haystack,
        $expectedResult,
    ): void {
        self::assertEquals(
            $expectedResult,
            ArrayUtility::filterByValueRecursive($needle, $haystack),
        );
    }
}

This way it is easy to find unit tests for any given file. Note PhpStorm understands this structure and can jump from a file to the according test file by hitting CTRL+Shift+T.

Extending UnitTestCase¶

Extending a unit test from class TYPO3\TestingFramework\Core\Unit\UnitTestCase of the typo3/testing-framework package instead of the native phpunit class PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase adds some functionality on top of phpunit:

• Environment backup: If a unit test has to fiddle with the Environment class, setting property $backupEnvironment to true instructs the unit test to reset the state after each call.
• If a system under test creates instances of classes implementing SingletonInterface, setting property $resetSingletonInstances to true instructs the unit test to reset internal GeneralUtility scope after each test. tearDown() will fail if there are dangling singletons, otherwise.
• Adding files or directories to array property $testFilesToDelete instructs the test to delete certain files or entire directories that have been created by unit tests. This property is useful to keep the system clean.
• A generic tearDown() method: That method is designed to test for TYPO3 specific global state changes and to let a unit test fail if it does not take care of these. For instance, if a unit tests add a singleton class to the system but does not declare that singletons should be flushed, the system will recognize this and let the according test fail. This is a great help for test developers to not run into side effects between unit tests. It is usually not needed to override this method, but if you do, call parent::tearDown() at the end of the inherited method to have the parent method kick in!
• A getAccessibleMock() method: This method can be useful if a protected method of the system under test class needs to be accessed. It also allows to "mock-away" other methods, but keep the method that is tested. Note this method should not be used if just a full class dependency needs to be mocked. Use prophecy (see below) to do this instead. If you find yourself using that method, it's often a hint that something in the system under test is broken and should be modelled differently. So, don't use that blindly and consider extracting the system under test to a utility or a service. But yes, there are situations when getAccessibleMock() can be very helpful to get things done.

General hints¶

• Creating an instance of the system under test should be done with new in the unit test and not using GeneralUtility::makeInstance().
• Only use getAccessibleMock() if parts of the system under test class itself needs to be mocked. Never use it for an object that is created by the system under test itself.
• Unit tests are by default configured to fail if a notice level PHP error is triggered. This has been used in the Core to slowly make the framework notice free. Extension authors may fall into a trap here: First, the unit test code itself, or the system under test may trigger notices. Developers should fix that. But it may happen a Core dependency triggers a notice that in turn lets the extensions unit test fail. At best, the extension developer pushes a patch to the Core to fix that notice. Another solution is to mock the dependency away, which may however not be desired or possible - especially with static dependencies.

A casual data provider¶

This is one of the most common use cases in unit testing: Some to-test method ("system under test") takes some argument and a unit tests feeds it with a series of input arguments to verify output is as expected. Data providers are used quite often for this and we encourage developers to do so, too. An example test from ArrayUtilityTest:

<?php

namespace TYPO3\CMS\Core\Tests\Unit\Utility;

use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\DataProvider;
use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\Test;
use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\ArrayUtility;
use TYPO3\TestingFramework\Core\Unit\UnitTestCase;

class ArrayUtilityTest extends UnitTestCase
{
    /**
     * Data provider for filterByValueRecursiveCorrectlyFiltersArray
     *
     * Every array splits into:
     * - String value to search for
     * - Input array
     * - Expected result array
     */
    public static function filterByValueRecursive(): array
    {
        return [
            'empty search array' => [
                'banana',
                [],
                [],
            ],
            'empty string as needle' => [
                '',
                [
                    '',
                    'apple',
                ],
                [
                    '',
                ],
            ],
            'flat array searching for string' => [
                'banana',
                [
                    'apple',
                    'banana',
                ],
                [
                    1 => 'banana',
                ],
            ],
            // ...
        ];
    }

    /**
     * @param array $needle
     * @param array $haystack
     * @param array $expectedResult
     */
    #[DataProvider('filterByValueRecursive')]
    #[Test]
    public function filterByValueRecursiveCorrectlyFiltersArray(
        $needle,
        $haystack,
        $expectedResult,
    ): void {
        self::assertEquals(
            $expectedResult,
            ArrayUtility::filterByValueRecursive($needle, $haystack),
        );
    }
}

Some hints on this: Try to give the single data sets good names, here "single value", "whole array" and "sub array". This helps to find a broken data set in the code, it forces the test writer to think about what they are feeding to the test and it helps avoiding duplicate sets. Additionally, put the data provider directly before the according test and name it "test name" + "DataProvider". Data providers are often not used in multiple tests, so that should almost always work.

Mocking¶

Unit tests should test one thing at a time, often one method only. If the system under test has dependencies like additional objects, they should be usually "mocked away". A simple example is this, taken from TYPO3\CMS\Backend\Tests\Unit\Controller\FormInlineAjaxControllerTest:

<?php

namespace TYPO3\CMS\Core\Tests\Unit\Utility;

use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\Test;
use TYPO3\CMS\Backend\Controller\FormInlineAjaxController;
use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Authentication\BackendUserAuthentication;
use TYPO3\TestingFramework\Core\Unit\UnitTestCase;

class FormInlineAjaxControllerTest extends UnitTestCase
{
    #[Test]
    public function getInlineExpandCollapseStateArraySwitchesToFallbackIfTheBackendUserDoesNotHaveAnUCInlineViewProperty(): void
    {
        $backendUser =
            $this->createMock(BackendUserAuthentication::class);

        $mockObject = $this->getAccessibleMock(
            FormInlineAjaxController::class,
            ['getBackendUserAuthentication'],
            [],
            '',
            false,
        );
        $mockObject->method('getBackendUserAuthentication')
            ->willReturn($backendUser);
        $result = $mockObject
            ->_call('getInlineExpandCollapseStateArray');

        self::assertEmpty($result);
    }
}

The above case is pretty straight since the mocked dependency is hand over as argument to the system under test. If the system under test however creates an instance of the to-mock dependency on its own - typically using GeneralUtility::makeInstance(), the mock instance can be manually registered for makeInstance:

<?php

namespace MyVendor\MyExtension\Tests\Unit;

use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Imaging\IconFactory;
use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\GeneralUtility;
use TYPO3\TestingFramework\Core\Unit\UnitTestCase;

class SomeTest extends UnitTestCase
{
    public function testSomething(): void
    {
        $iconFactory =
            $this->createMock(IconFactory::class);
        GeneralUtility::addInstance(IconFactory::class, $iconFactory);
    }

    protected function tearDown(): void
    {
        GeneralUtility::purgeInstances();
        parent::tearDown();
    }
}

This works well for prototypes. addInstance() adds objects to a LiFo, multiple instances of the same class can be stacked. The generic ->tearDown() later confirms the stack is empty to avoid side effects on other tests. Singleton instances can be registered in a similar way:

<?php

namespace TYPO3\CMS\Backend\Tests\Unit\Form\FormDataProvider;

use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\Test;
use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Cache\CacheManager;
use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Cache\Frontend\FrontendInterface;
use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\GeneralUtility;
use TYPO3\TestingFramework\Core\Unit\UnitTestCase;

final class TcaFlexPrepareTest extends UnitTestCase
{
    protected bool $resetSingletonInstances = true;
    protected function setUp(): void
    {
        parent::setUp();
        // Suppress cache foo in xml helpers of GeneralUtility
        $cacheManagerMock =
            $this->createMock(CacheManager::class);
        GeneralUtility::setSingletonInstance(
            CacheManager::class,
            $cacheManagerMock,
        );
        $cacheFrontendMock =
            $this->createMock(FrontendInterface::class);
        $cacheManagerMock
            ->method('getCache')
            ->with(self::anything())
            ->willReturn($cacheFrontendMock);
    }

    #[Test]
    public function addDataKeepsExistingDataStructure(): void
    {
        // Test something
    }
}

If adding singletons, make sure to set the property protected $resetSingletonInstances = true;, otherwise ->tearDown() will detect a dangling singleton and let's the unit test fail to avoid side effects on other tests.

Static dependencies¶

If a system under test has a dependency to a static method (typically from a utility class), then hopefully the static method is a "good" dependency that sticks to the general static method guide: A "good" static dependency has no state, triggers no further code that has state. If this is the case, think of this dependency code as being inlined within the system under test directly. Do not try to mock it away, just test it along with the system under test.

If however the static method that is called is a "bad" dependency that statically calls further magic by creating new objects, doing database calls and has own state, this is harder to come by. One solution is to extract the static method call to an own method, then use getAccessibleMock() to mock that method away. And yeah, that is ugly. Unit tests can quite quickly show which parts of the framework are not modelled in a good way. A typical case is TYPO3\CMS\Backend\Utility\BackendUtility - trying to unit test systems that have this class as dependency is often very painful. There is not much developers can do in this case. The Core tries to slowly improve these areas over time and indeed BackendUtility is shrinking each version.

Exception handling¶

Code should throw exceptions if something goes wrong. See working with exceptions for some general guides on proper exception handling. Exceptions are often very easy to unit test and testing them can be beneficial. Let's take a simple example, this is from TYPO3\CMS\Core\Tests\Unit\Cache\CacheManagerTest and tests both the exception class and the exception code:

<?php

namespace TYPO3\CMS\Backend\Tests\Unit\Form\FormDataGroup;

use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\Test;
use TYPO3\CMS\Backend\Form\FormDataGroup\OnTheFly;
use TYPO3\TestingFramework\Core\Unit\UnitTestCase;

final class OnTheFlyTest extends UnitTestCase
{
    protected OnTheFly $subject;

    protected function setUp(): void
    {
        parent::setUp();
        $this->subject = new OnTheFly();
    }

    #[Test]
    public function compileThrowsExceptionWithEmptyOnTheFlyList(): void
    {
        $this->expectException(\UnexpectedValueException::class);
        $this->expectExceptionCode(1441108674);
        $this->subject->compile([]);
    }
}